Israel Environment Bulletin Summer 1997-5758, Vol. 20, No. 3
COMBATING DESERTIFICATION
Editor's Note: The following is excerpted from the Israel statement,
delivered by Mr. Rafael Eitan, Deputy Prime Minister and Minister of
Agriculture and the Environment, to the Asian Ministerial Conference on
the Implementation of the Convention on Combating Desertification (CCD) in
Asia which was convened in Beijing on 13 May 1997.
Asia is a gigantic continent, covering 33 percent of the earth surface of
the globe. Nearly half of the area of this continent is 45 percent
drylandhyperarid, arid, semiarid and dry subhumid drylands. Already 19
percent of the drylands of Asia are desertified, namelytheir
productivity, which is naturally low compared to non-drylands, has been
damaged by over-exploitation and mismanagement of natural resources by
mankind.
Israel is an Asian country too, with an area of only 24 thousand square
kilometers, which are just five-hundredth of one percent of all Asia. But,
whereas in Asia 46 percent of the land is dryland, 90 percent of Israel is
dryland. Although the area is so small, it is diverse in the types of
dryland, and all four types of global drylandshyperarid, arid, semiarid
and dry sub-humidoccur within Israel. Thus, most of Israel is dryland,
susceptible to, yet barely affected, by desertification.
The above is due to the fact that when Israel set out to develop its
natural resources, it identified the risks entailed in the development of
drylands, and adopted, from the outset, a policy of development that is
sustainable. This development not only did not bring about
desertification, namely a reduction in the natural productivity of the
land, but rather promoted a persistent, sustainable increase in
productivity, to beyond that of the dryland's naturally low productivity.
Israel has accomplished this first by substantial investment in scientific
researchin soil, climate, agriculture, forestry and ecological sciences.
Achievements in basic science were then translated into technological
advances and applied in the field, thus bringing about sustainable
development of the Israel drylands and the prevention of their
desertification.
How has Israel translated its research achievements into accomplishments
in sustainable development and prevention of desertification? Israel
realized that it is difficult to preserve soil productivity when
development of the drylands is based on the traditional occupation of the
inhabitants of the drylandslivestock fed on rangelands. This is brought
about because of the pressures the growing human population and the need
to increase its standard of living. Sooner or later, overgrazing and
over-exploitation of the range leads to the eventual collapse of their
productivity. That is why, these days, most livestock in Israel is fed on
croplands-produced fodder, and most Israeli rangelands have been
transformed into croplands.
Israel also understood very early on, that it is not feasible to base
modern agriculture on drylands, while relying on the low and inconsistent
rainfall of these lands. For dryland agriculture to be economically
viable, and not lead to topsoil erosion, the soil has to be covered by
agricultural growth the whole year round, also during periods of drought,
and it should provide the population with a stable source of income, in
spite of climatic instability of the drylands. Therefore, dryland
agriculture should be irrigated, and there is no other way to provide
year-round irrigation than to transport water to the drylands from
elsewhere. Thus, the Israeli weapon for combating desertification is
sustainable agricultural development of the drylands through centralized
national water management, that includes transportation of water from
regions of water abundance to regions of water shortage, through storage
during years of abundance for use in years of drought, and through raising
crops adapted each to a different quality of water and to the specific
local climatic and soil conditions of the drylands.
Israel also realized that the greatest risk in the transformation of
traditional dryland-rangeland to modern cropland, and in the
transformation of rain-fed to irrigated dryland, is soil salinization.
Transportation of water to areas of shortage alone will not generate
sustainable dryland agriculture, unless irrigation methods and
technologies are developed and implemented which reduce water loss by
evaporation, and prevent the accumulation of salts on the surface and in
the root zone of the crops. Israel pioneered drip-irrigation technologies
and practices, and as a result has produced record crops in drylands by
developing "protected agriculture" technologies. These desert greenhouses
are instrumental in reducing evaporation and preventing soil salinization.
Thus, Israeli dryland agriculture has not caused a gradual loss of soil
productivity as development pressures increase. Rather, the crops grown in
Israel's drylands compete successfully with similar crops grown in
non-desert regions, and they provide, as exported cash crops, a reliable
and respectable source of income to their growers. Israel produces its
dairy products from range-independent livestock, thus overgrazing is
avoided, especially where elsewhere it brings about destabilization of
sand dunes and the consequent desertification.
Therefore, although within its territory, there are many sand dunes and
sandy soils, Israel has not suffered from the overlaying of fertile
croplands by moving sands, and from other desertification effects caused
by moving dunes. Moreover, Israel discovered that in drylands, sandy soils
have an advantage over non-sandy soils, due to the water-holding capacity
of the sand. Thus, paradoxically, the sandy soils of Israel are not looked
upon as a curse, but as a blessing and they are sought after by the
farmers. At the same time, Israel has developed means for maintaining the
stability of its sand-dunes and helps advance research on sand-dune plants
and on the microbial soil crusts of such sands and other desert soils.
Most of Israel is dryland, yet in the historical past, its sub-humid parts
have been covered by scrublands and dry woodlands which protected the soil
and its fertility. Whereas during historical times these woodlands covered
30 percent of Israel, when the State was established in 1948, only less
than one percent remained forested. Israel has developed forestry and
forest rehabilitation methods for drylands. As a result, nearly 50 years
after its establishment, it increased the forested area from less than 1
percent to nearly 10 percent of its territory. By utilizing methods and
practices of run-off harvesting, Israel succeeded in afforestation of
regions with 200 mm of rain a year, with trees that normally occur only
where rainfall is more than 350 mm. Israel is currently developing
afforestation practices for semi-arid and even arid regions, and aims at
achieving savannah-like landscapes there. The Israeli afforestation effort
is combating soil erosion and thus prevents desertification. At the same
time, it promotes the natural dryland biodiversity, and functions as a
sink for atmospheric carbon, thus mitigating the greenhouse effect and
global warming.
While developing large areas of its drylands as agricultural areas and
others as afforestation areas, Israel has also allocated much land for
conserving its rich biodiversity. More than 3,000 species of wild plants
grow in Israel, and many of these are of economic potential, such as
relatives and progenitors of cultivated domestic plants used for
reconstructing the eroding genetic basis of many food plants. These
important plant species of Israel are protected in about 150 nature
reserves, which cover about 15 percent of the size of the State, mostly in
its drylands. These protected areas are of economic significance and play
a role in combating desertification, in that they provide ecosystem
services for agricultural areas by their contribution to the recharging of
aquifers, later used to irrigate dryland agriculture. These nature
reserves are also used for recreation and tourist activities, thus
providing alternative livelihoods for the inhabitants of the
drylandslivelihoods that do not exert pressure on the sensitive soil
resources of the drylands.
Israel has never kept to itself the knowledge that brought about these
achievements, but has shared it with all dryland developing countries for
yearsin Latin America, Africa, the Mediterranean and Asia. The know-how
and the Israeli experience also promoted desert agriculture and means for
combating desertification in some of the countries of the Middle
Eastindirectly and recently, also directly. Israeli experts have reached
every spot on earth to which they have been invited to advise and train.
Israeli institutions of research and training were always open for
farmers, leaders of local communities, students, trainees, experts and
extension officers of many developing countries, including Asian ones. The
Israeli approach in technology transfer and the sharing of know-how and
expertise was always the bottom-up approachthe training of field
personnel and working together with the grassroots level, in the remotest
and most problem-ridden places. Israel has never offered developing
countries technologies which had been developed in Israel for adoption
under different conditions. Rather, Israeli experts worked together with
the local people of developing countries on the adaptation of Israeli
technologies for specific local conditions at the sites of implementation.
To conclude, by investing in prevention of desertification rather than in
combating already prevailing desertification, by stressing science and
technology, but at the same time respecting indigenous knowledge, by
adopting the bottom-up approach in training and technology transfer,
Israel has acted as a party to the Convention to Combat Desertification
(CCS), many years even before the term "desertification" was coined, and
before the negotiations on the Desertification Convention had started. It
was, therefore, only natural that Israel would be active in the
preparation and construction of the CCS from the day the negotiations
started, and would contribute to the important and critical deliberation
in Nairobi, Geneva and New York, and would eventually be one of the first
nations to sign and ratify this important convention.
Israel has concluded, at the beginning of this year, a joint project with
the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan and the Palestinian Authority, in which
desertification risks in the Arava and Dead Sea Valleys have been jointly
explored. Israel is also an active party in a joint project with the
Palestinian Authority, Jordan, Egypt and Tunisia: the "Initiative to
Combat Desertification in the Middle East." The role of Israel in this
project is to provide regional support activities in the area of economic
afforestation in drylands.
Finally, Israel is currently in the final stages of planning the
International Center for Combating Desertification in Sde Boker, at the
heart of its Negev desert. For the last twenty years, the Israel national
institute for the study of desertsthe Blaustein Institute for Desert
Research of Ben-Gurion University of the Negevis active in Sde Boker
This institute, designed to generate scientific research and technological
advances for settling the drylands of Israel, and which nowadays
spearheads the collaboration of Israel with its Middle Eastern neighbors
in combating the sub-regional desertification, will constitute the core of
the International Center for Combating Desertification, to be developed
with a loan by the government of Germany.