Israel Environment Bulletin Spring 1993-5754, Vol. 16, No. 2
VOICE OF AMERICA: AN END TO A STRUGGLE
It was a long, drawn-out struggle, but in February 1993, Arava
residents and nature lovers throughout the country finally had
cause for celebration: the recent decision of the US administration
to cancel plans to build a Voice of America relay station in
Israel. "We are very happy that the threat to residents and
wildlife has been lifted... We fought a just fight and won, though
we were ranked against huge forces. Our struggle encompassed the
world, and together with other bodies we prevented a rash and
harmful decision from being made," reacted Yoav Sagi, chairman of
the Society for the Protection of Nature in Israel. The sense of
satisfaction was shared by Environment Minister Yossi Sarid, who
expressed his opposition to the project soon after coming into
office: "The decision saved the Negev and returned it to the
residents and to all Israelis," said Sarid, upon hearing the news.
The project itself was born in December 1984 when Ronald Reagan,
then USA president, applied to Israel for approval to establish a
transmission station through which Voice of America and Radio Free
Europe programs would be broadcast to the Communist world. A
national masterplan and environmental impact statement (EIS) were
commissioned by the National Planning and Building Board in June
1986 and the agreement itself was signed in June 1987.
News of the agreement drew the immediate reaction of environmental
groups the most vocal being the SPNI and Arava residents.
But their opposition was not blind; it called for the project to be
carefully reviewed before a fateful decision is taken. Only after
the risks were made known, did the stance come about: that this
country is too small and densely populated to contain such a
mammoth station, that the erection of the station would pose a
major threat to local tourism in one of the last unspoiled desert
areas, that the potential risk to human health and to millions of
migratory birds cannot be easily dismissed. These arguments were
countered on economic grounds; supporters talked of the economic
boost which the project would afford the Negev area and the
creation of hundreds of jobs in an area suffering from high
unemployment.
As the authorities readied to bring the masterplan for final
approval to the National Planning Board, a long and massive
campaign was initiated in Israel by the SPNI and the region's
residents. It included widespread activity among the general
public, the Knesset, the government and the national planning
authorities and focused on the fact that the plan was brought for
final approval before the required EIS was completed. Yet pressures
by the government to accept the terms of the agreement proved too
strong; the National Board approved the masterplan in June 1990.
This sequence of events, as well as the dangers embodied in the
transmitter complex, led the SPNI and residents of the Arava Valley
to lodge an appeal with the High Court of Justice. By July 1991, a
unanimous ruling was made: no decision should be taken on the
location of the VOA complex before making thorough studies on
possible dangers to birds from electromagnetic radiation, as well
as on the relocation of the Israel Defense Forces training zone
necessitated by the construction of the transmitter station.
The SPNI fight was not limited to Israel. Dozens of European
ornithological groups expressed their concern for the migratory
birds, and the General Assembly of the IUCN adopted a special
resolution in December 1990 calling upon the governments of Israel
and the US to withhold approval of the project until full
completion of the EIS is effected. From offices it shares with
Friends of the Earth, the Sierra Club, and the National Audubon
Society, the American branch of the SPNI petitioned congressmen and
senators and interested the American press in the struggle.
In late January 1993, the Knesset environmental caucus called on
the government to cancel the Voice of America project in the Arava.
Over 70 MKs from across the political spectrum signed a letter to
Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin calling on him to halt approval of the
project until the new US administration has had time to determine
its position on the issue. "We call on you to listen to our plea,
along with that of scientists, local residents, and the public, who
have expressed their strong opposition to the establishment of the
transmitter relay station in the Arava because of the harm it will
cause to one of the last open spaces left in this crowded country,
the quality of life of the Arava residents, and because of the
danger to native animals and migratory birds," the letter said.
Just days before the fateful decision on the part of the American
government, demonstrators from the SPNI and Arava settlements stood
in the Jerusalem snow, shouting "VOA, Go Away," as members of the
National Planning and Building Board met to discuss, once again,
the fate of the station. While the Israeli overseers of the
project said the survey by international experts showed no real
harm would be caused to the birds, Environment Ministry
representatives claimed the report was incomplete as the survey had
not been carried out over a full year, the required meteorological
report was incomplete and the final report had not included
complete figures on the affected birds. Minister of the Environment
Sarid instructed his representative at the National Board to
present the ministry's objection to the plan, on three grounds:
"the harmful effects of electromagnetic radiation on humans,
irreversible damage to the Arava landscape, and the expected damage
to birds, particularly birds of prey".
Yet birds were not the only ones that would have been imperilled by
the VOA transmitter. More perilous was the potential damage to the
few open landscapes left in Israel, one of the world's most densely
populated countries, in the area north of Beersheva. The area
designated for the station, 800 hectares of savannah-like
landscape, would have been shaved of vegetation and of hundreds of
ancient acacia trees, to be replaced by 160-meter towers and a
kilometer-long line of unsightly antennas and nets.
Damage to the landscape, waste of land reserves, risks to birds,
opposition of Arava residents who feared for their health and the
health of their children, risks to tourism, changes in the
geopolitical condition, new technologies all these necessitated
cancellation of the project. Cancellation was imperative not only
for the sake of birds and natural assets but for the sake of the
people of this land, in order to offer them open spaces for the
renewal of their souls and to enable them to live a life in which
the preservation of landscapes, heritage and cultural values are
fully integrated.