The Madrid Conference Opening Speeches
October 30-31, 1991
ADDRESS BY MR. YITZHAK SHAMIR
PRIME MINISTER OF ISRAEL
October 31, 1991
Distinguished Co-Chairmen, Ministers, Members of Delegations to the
Conference, Ladies and Gentlemen,
It is an honor to represent the people of Israel at this historic
moment; and a privilege to address this opening of peace talks between
Israel and its Arab neighbors.
I would like to express our profound appreciation to our Spanish hosts
for their hospitality, and for making this gathering for peace possible.
In its two thousand years of wandering, the Jewish people paused here
for several hundred years until they were expelled 500 years ago. It was
in Spain that the great Jewish poet and philosopher, Yehuda Halevi,
expressed the yearning for Zion of all Jews, in the words: "My heart is
in the East, while I am in the utter most West."
I would also like to extend our appreciation to the co-sponsors of this
conference - to the U.S., which has maintained a strong friend ship
with Israel in an alliance that has overcome occasional differences. And
to the Soviet Union, which saved the lives of many Jews during the
Second World War, and has now opened its gates to the repatriation of
Jews to their ancient homeland.
The people of Israel look to this palace with great anticipation and
expectation. We pray that this meeting will mark the beginning of a new
chapter in the history of the Middle East; that it will signal the end
of hostility, violence, terror and war; that it will bring dialogue,
accommodation, coexistence and - above all - peace.
Distinguished Co-Chairmen, Ladies and Gentlemen,
To appreciate the meaning of peace for the people of Israel, one has to
view to day's Jewish sovereignty in the Land of Israel against the
back ground of our his tory.
Jews have been persecuted through out the ages in almost every
continent. Some countries barely tolerated us, others op pressed,
tortured, slaughtered, and exiled us.
This century saw the Nazi regime set out to exterminate us. The Sho'ah,
the Holocaust, the catastrophic genocide of un precedented proportions
which destroyed a third of our people, became possible because no one
defended us. Being home less, we were also defense less.
But it was not the Holocaust which made the world community recognize
our rightful claim to the Land of Israel. In fact, the rebirth of the
State of Israel so soon after the Holocaust has made the world forget
that our claim is immemorial. We are the only people who have lived in
the Land of Israel without interruption for nearly 4,000 years; we are
the only people, except for a short Crusader king dom, who have had an
independent sovereignty in this land; we are the only people for whom
Jerusalem has been a capital; we are the only people whose sacred places
are only in the Land of Israel.
No nation has expressed its bond with its land with as much intensity
and consistency as we have. For millennia our people repeated at every
occasion the cry of the Psalmist: "If I forget thee, Jerusalem, may my
right hand lose its cunning." For millennia we have encouraged each
other with the greeting, "next year in Jerusalem." For millennia our
prayers, literature, and folklore have expressed powerful longing to
re turn to our land. Only Eretz-Israel, the Land of Israel, is our true
homeland. Any other country, no matter how hospitable, is still a
diaspora, a temporary station on the way home.
To others, it was not an attractive land. No one wanted it. Mark Twain
de scribed it only a hundred years ago as "a desolate country, which
sits in sack cloth and ashes, a silent mournful expanse, which not even
imagination can grace with the pomp of life."
The Zionist movement gave political expression to our claim to the Land
of Israel. And in 1922 the League of Nations recognized the justice of
this claim. It understood the compelling historic imperative of
establishing a Jewish home land in the Land of Israel. The United
Nations Organization re affirmed this recognition after the Second World
War.
Regrettably, the Arab leaders, whose friendship we wanted most, opposed
a Jewish state in the region. With a few distinguished exceptions, they
claimed that the Land of Israel is part of the Arab domain that
stretches from the Atlantic to the Persian Gulf.
In defiance of international will and legality, the Arab regimes
attempted to overrun and destroy the Jewish state even before it was
born. The Arab spokesman at the U.N. declared that the establishment of
a Jewish state would cause a bloodbath which would make the slaughters
of Ghengis Khan pale into insignificance.
In its Declaration of Independence on May 15, 1948, Israel stretched out
its hand in peace to its Arab neighbors, calling for an end to war and
bloodshed. In response, seven Arab states invaded Israel. The U.N.
resolution that partitioned the country was thus violated and
effectively annulled.
The U.N. did not create Israel. The Jewish State came into being because
the tiny Jewish community, in what was Mandatory Palestine, rebelled
against foreign imperialist rule. We did not conquer a foreign land. We
repulsed the Arab onslaught, prevented Israel's annihilation, declared
its independence, and established a viable state and government
institutions within a very short time.
After their attack on Israel failed, the Arab regimes continued their
fight against Israel with boycott, blockade, terrorism, and outright
war. Soon after the establishment of Israel, they turned against the
Jewish communities in Arab countries. A wave of oppression,
expropriation, and expulsion caused a mass exodus of some 800,000 Jews
from lands they had inhabited from before the rise of Islam. Most of
these Jewish refugees, stripped of their considerable possessions, came
to Israel. They were welcomed by the Jewish State. They were given
shelter and support, and they were integrated into Israeli society
together with half a million survivors of the European Holocaust.
The Arab regimes' rejection of Israel's existence in the Middle East,
and the continuous war they have waged against it are part of history.
There have been attempts to rewrite this history which depict the Arabs
as victims and Israel as the aggressor. Like attempts to deny the
Holocaust, they will fail. With the demise of totalitarian regimes in
most of the world, this perversion of History will disappear. In their
war against Israel's existence, the Arab governments took advantage of
the Cold War. They enlisted the military, economic, and political
support of the Communist world against Israel, and they turned a local,
regional conflict into an inter national powder-keg. This caused the
Middle East to be flooded with arms, which fueled wars and turned the
area into a dangerous battle ground and a testing arena for
sophisticated weapons. At the U.N., the Arab states mustered the support
of other Muslim countries and the Soviet Bloc. Together they had an
automatic majority for countless resolutions that perverted history,
paraded fiction as fact, and made a travesty of the U.N. and its
Charter.
Arab hostility to Israel has also brought tragic human suffering to the
Arab people. Tens of thou sands have been killed and wounded. Hundreds
of thousands of Arabs who lived in Mandatory Pales tine were encouraged
by their own leaders to flee from their homes. Their suffering is a blot
on humanity. No decent person, least of all a Jew of this era, can be
oblivious to this suffering.
Several hundreds of thousands of Palestinian Arabs live in slums known
as refugee camps in Gaza, Judea, and Samaria. Attempts by Israel to
rehabilitate and house them have been defeated by Arab objections. Nor
has their fate been any better in Arab states. Unlike the Jewish
refugees who came to Israel from Arab countries, most Arab refugees were
neither welcomed nor integrated by their hosts. Only the Kingdom of
Jordan awarded them citizenship. Their plight has been used as a
political weapon against Israel.
The Arabs who have chosen to re main in Israel - Christian, Muslim and
Druze - have become full-fledged citizens enjoying equal rights and
representation in the legislature, in the judiciary, and in all walks of
life.
We, who over the centuries were denied access to our holy places,
respect the religion of all faiths in our country. Our law guarantees
freedom of worship and protects the holy places of every religion.
Distinguished Co-Chairmen, Ladies and Gentlemen,
I stand before you today in yet another quest for peace, not only on
behalf of the State of Israel, but in the name of the entire Jewish
people, that has maintained an unbreakable bond with the Land of Israel
for almost 4,000 years.
Our pursuit of accommodation and peace has been relentless. For us, the
in gathering of Jews into their ancient homeland, their integration in
our society, and the creation of the necessary infrastructure are at the
very top of our national agenda. A nation that faces such a gigantic
challenge would most naturally desire peace with all its neighbors.
Since the beginning of Zionism, we have formulated innumerable peace
proposals and plans. All of them were rejected. The first crack in the
wall of hostility occurred in 1977 when the late President Anwar Sadat
of Egypt decided to break the taboo and come to Jerusalem. His gesture
was reciprocated with enthusiasm by the people and government of Israel,
headed by Menachem Begin. This development led to the Camp David Accords
and the Treaty of Peace between Egypt and Israel. Four years later, in
May 1983, an agreement was signed with the lawful government of Lebanon.
Unfortunately, this agreement was not fulfilled, because of out side
intervention. But the precedent was set, and we looked forward to
courageous steps, similar to those of Anwar Sadat. Regrettably, not one
Arab leader has seen fit to come forward and respond to our call for
peace.
Today's gathering is a result of a sustained American effort, based on
our own peace plan of May 1989 which, in turn, was founded on the Camp
David Accords.
According to the American initiative, the purpose of this meeting is to
launch direct peace negotiations between Israel and each of its
neighbors, and multi lateral negotiations on regional issues among all
the countries of the region.
We have always believed that only direct, bi lateral talks can bring
peace. We have agreed to pre cede such talks with this ceremonial
conference, but we hope that Arab consent to direct, bi lateral talks
indicates an understanding that there is no other way to peace. In the
Middle East, this has special meaning, because such talks imply mutual
acceptance; and the root cause of the conflict is the Arab refusal to
recognize the legitimacy of the State of Israel.
The multilateral talks that would accompany the bilateral negotiations
are a vital component in the process. In these talks, the essential
ingredients of coexistence and regional cooperation will be discussed.
There cannot be genuine peace in our region unless these regional issues
are addressed and resolved.
We believe the goal of the bilateral negotiations is to sign peace
treaties between Israel and its neighbors, and to reach an agreement on
interim self-government arrangements with the Palestinian Arabs. But
nothing can be achieved without goodwill. I appeal to the Arab leaders,
those who are here and those who have not yet joined the process: Show
us and the world that you accept Israel's existence. Demonstrate your
readiness to accept Israel as a permanent entity in the region. Let the
people in our region hear you speak in the language of reconciliation,
coexistence, and peace with Israel.
In Israel there is an almost total consensus for the need for peace. We
only differ on the best ways to achieve it. In most Arab countries the
opposite seems to be true: the only differences are over the ways to
push Israel into a defenseless position and, ultimately, to destruction.
We would like to see in your countries an end to poisonous preachings
against Israel. We would like to see an indication of the kind of hunger
for peace which characterizes Israeli society.
We appeal to you to renounce the Jihad against Israel. We appeal to you
to denounce the PLO covenant which calls for Israel's destruction. We
appeal to you to condemn declarations that call for Israel's
annihilation, like the one issued by the rejectionist conference in
Teheran last week. We appeal to you to let Jews, who wish to leave your
countries, go.
And we address a call to the Palestinian Arabs: Renounce violence and
terrorism; use the universities in the administered territories -
whose existence was made possible only by Israel - for learning and
development, not agitation and violence; stop exposing your children to
danger by sending them to throw bombs and stones at soldiers and
civilians.
Just two days ago, we were reminded that Palestinian terrorism is still
ram pant, when a mother of seven children and a father of four were
slaughtered in cold blood. We cannot remain indifferent and be expected
to talk with people involved in such repulsive activities. We appeal to
you to shun dictators like Saddam Hussein who aim to destroy Israel;
stop the brutal torture and murder of those who do not agree with you;
allow us, and the world community, to build decent housing for the
people who now live in refugee camps. Above all, we hope you finally
realize that you could have been at this table long ago, soon after the
Camp David accords were first concluded, had you chosen dialogue instead
of violence, co existence instead of terrorism.
Ladies and Gentlemen: We come to this process with an open heart,
sincere intentions, and great expectations. We are committed to
negotiating without interruption until an agreement is reached. There
will be problems, obstacles, crises, and conflicting claims. But it is
better to talk than to shed blood. Wars have not solved anything in our
region. They have only caused misery, suffering, bereavement, and
hatred.
We know our partners to the negotiations will make territorial demands
on Israel. But, as an examination of the conflict's long history makes
clear, its nature is not territorial. It raged well be fore Israel
acquired Judea, Samaria, Gaza, and the Golan in a defensive war. There
was no hint of recognition of Israel before the war in 1967, when the
territories in question were not under Israeli control.
We are a nation of four million. The Arab nations from the Atlantic to
the Gulf number 170 million. We control only 28,000 square kilometers.
The Arabs possess a land mass of 14 million square kilometers. The issue
is not territory but our existence.
It will be regrettable if the talks focus primarily and exclusively on
territory. It is the quickest way to an impasse. What we need, first and
foremost, is the building of confidence, the removal of the danger of
confrontation, and the development of relations in as many spheres as
possible.
The issues are complex, and the negotiations will be lengthy and
difficult. We submit that the best venue for the talks is in our region,
in close proximity to the decision-makers, not in a foreign land. We
invite our partners to this process to come to Israel for the first
round of talks. On our part, we are ready to go to Jordan, to Lebanon,
and to Syria for the same purpose. There is no better way to make peace
than to talk in each other's home. Avoiding such talks is a denial of
the purpose of the negotiations. I would welcome a positive answer from
the representatives of these states here and now. We must learn to live
together. We must learn to live without war, without bloodshed. Judaism
has given the world not only the belief in one God, but the idea that
all men and women are created in God's image. There is no greater sin
than to ravage this image by shedding blood.
I am sure that there is no Arab mother who wants her son to die in
battle - just as there is no Jewish mother who wants her son to die in
war. I believe every mother wants her children to learn the art of
living, not the science of war.
For many hundreds of years, wars, deep antagonisms, and terrible
suffering cursed this continent on which we meet. The nations of Europe
saw the rise of dictators and their defeat after lengthy and painful
struggles. Now, they are together - former bitter enemies - in a united
community. They are discussing the good of the community, co operating
in all matters, acting almost as one unit. I envy them. I would like to
see such a community rise in the Middle East. And I believe that,
despite all differences between us, we should be able, gradually, to
build a united regional community. Today it is a dream - but we have
seen, in our own lifetime, some of the most fantastic dreams become
reality. Today, the gulf separating the two sides is still too wide; the
Arab hostility to Israel too deep; the lack of trust too immense, to
permit a dramatic, quick solution. But, we must start on the long road
to reconciliation with this first step in the peace pro cess. We are
convinced that human nature prefers peace to war and belligerence. We,
who have had to fight seven wars and sacrifice many thousands of lives,
glorify neither death nor war. The Jewish faith exalts peace even to the
extent that it considers it a synonym for the Creator Himself. We yearn
for peace. We pray for peace.
We believe the blessing of peace can turn the Middle East into a
paradise; a center of cultural, scientific, medical and technological
creativity. We can foresee a period of great economic progress that
would put an end to misery, hunger and illiteracy. It could put the
Middle East - the cradle of civilization - on the road to a new era.
Such a goal merits our devotion and dedication for as long as it is
necessary until, in the words of the prophet Isaiah, we shall be able to
turn "swords into ploughshares" and bring the blessings of peace to all
the peoples of our region. Let me conclude with the words of the same
prophet: "Peace, peace, both for far and near, says the Lord."
Distinguished Co-Chairmen, Ladies and Gentlemen,
Let us resolve to leave this hall with a united determination that from
now on, any differences we may have will be solved only by negotiations,
goodwill, and mutual tolerance. Let us declare, here and now, an end to
war, to belligerency, and to hostility. Let us march forward together,
to reconciliation and peace.