The Madrid Conference Opening Speeches
October 30-31, 1991
STATEMENT BY MR. AMRE MOUSSA
MINISTER OF FOREIGN AFFAIRS OF THE ARAB REPUBLIC OF EGYPT
October 30, 1991
In the name of God, the Most Merciful and the Most Compassionate:
Your Excellency Mr. James Baker, Secretary of State of the U.S.A., Your
Excellency Mr. Boris Pankin, Foreign Minister of the U.S.S.R.,
Excellencies, Heads of Delegations,
Allow me at the outset to convey to you and to the Peace Conference
which you compose, a message of profound appreciation and sincere hopes
from President Hosni Mubarak, of the Arab Republic of Egypt, that the
convening of the Peace Conference in the Middle East would launch a
genuine peace process ushering in all the peoples of the Middle East
towards new vistas replacing inequity with justice, oppression with
freedom, occupation with liberation, hostility with coexistence, doubts
with confidence, and war with peace.
A multitude of emotions overwhelm us when we gather today in this great
country, Spain, whose his tory witnessed long centuries of prosperous
Arab culture, which achieved active and positive inter action between
Latin and Arabic cultures. It laid [the] basis of a very rich cultural
blend and back ground. This blend stands today an evidence of
communication, not alienation or isolation of cultures, of the
consolidation of coexistence, cooperation and peace.
We, Egyptians and Arabs, authors of history, contributors to world
civilization, ancient and con temporary, unmistakably and authentically,
have strongly determined to participate in the formulation of a
framework of a new world, a framework of cooperation and interaction,
with principles of justice, legitimacy as its texture; equality and
reciprocity in rights and obligations as its structure.
The great efforts exerted to help convene this historic gathering to
launch the peace process in the Middle East, represent signals, to be
hopefully con firmed by the forthcoming negotiations, of the emergence
of a new will, of a staunch determination by all to achieve a just,
comprehensive, peaceful settlement of the Arab-Israeli conflict, the
core of which is the question of Palestine.
At this crossroad of world history, when all the peoples in the Middle
East look forward with hope and anticipation to this great event, we,
along with millions of Arabs, and Israelis, indeed all those who
genuinely advocate peace and freedom, feel profoundly indebted to the
courageous, unrelenting and determined efforts of the U.S.
Administration throughout the few months since March 8, when President
Bush embarked on his peace initiative, with the active and consistent
support of the Soviet Union. U.S. Secretary of State James Baker,
through his unending highly commendable diplomatic creativity, to which
I am a witness and at long last, accomplished a historic mission. The
Palestinian people through their representatives took the difficult
decision, so did Syria, Jordan and Israel. The decision is historic. The
significance is great, it is a courageous decision to respond to the
challenge of peace, a decision which we believe will be also an option
for peace.
The unprecedented transformations in inter national relations which
demolished walls of isolation, ideologies of confrontation, did lay the
foundations for just settlements and achievement of peace in many
troubled and conflict areas.
The evolution of history at this juncture has opened for peoples and
states which have not, for different reasons, availed themselves of
peace opportunities before; new, probably last, prospects for the
exercise of the free will of peoples to choose their own future for the
restoration of their rights, opening horizons of cooperation, mutual
recognition of rights and duties, for the establishment of peace with
justice that would resolve the conflicting claims in a spirit of
reconciliation, accommodation and harmony through dialogue and
negotiation.
The cradle of the most ancient civilizations, the birthplace of three
monotheistic divine religions, Judaism, Christianity and Islam; the
Middle East, was plagued for decades with wars, violence and revenge.
More than any other region in the world, it has been doomed with
untold-of tragedies, full of tears, blood and human miseries. Despair,
frustration, chaos and death were the haunting figure roving in all
parts of these otherwise blessed territories.
The Middle East region is not perennially doomed to this fate. We
believe in our collective ability to reorient the course of history, to
write a new chapter for the Middle East, void of the bitter legacies of
acrimony, vendetta, fears, and doubts, but instead, full of tolerance,
confidence, fervor, and joint human endeavor for the sake and benefit of
the future generations, Arabs and Israelis and the whole world.
Ladies and Gentlemen,
Peace was the message emanating from the East, from Mount Sinai in
Egypt, from Nazareth and Jerusalem, from Mecca and Medina, those eternal
beacon houses for mankind. Peoples in the four corners of the world
espoused the message of peace and echoed the call for one God Almighty.
Will the sons of Abraham rededicate themselves to the divine message of
peace and brotherhood? The decision is ours. We will stand accountable
before our people and the peoples of the world if we fail to pass the
test, and we must pass the test.
With goodwill, strong determination and positive political will, we can
make 1991 the beginning of the end of a long agonizing ordeal. This is a
moment of historic decision, a moment for courage, patience, wisdom,
self-confidence and vision.
In history, ancient, medieval, or modern, balances of power are never
eternal. At a time, could be replaced or even annulled in different
contexts of time or space. History stands a most eloquent testimony to
this fact. Force never resolved a conflict similar to that of the Middle
East and never will, especially if it involves a multitude of factors
and claims against a background of religion, history, culture and
geography and when it involves more than one party.
This is the inherent morale behind the Arab-Israeli conflict. It is a
conflict which defied resolution by sheer force. It is a conflict over
rights, claims, counterclaims which have to be reconciled but not denied
or suppressed.
To this end, Egypt, an equal and full partner in the quest for peace,
will leave no stone unturned, no path uncharted, no horizons unexplored
to discharge its responsibility towards its Arab and Palestinian
brothers and towards the whole region until the establishment of a
genuine peace in honor and dignity.
Egypt is bound by historic, cultural ties and legal obligations with its
Arab brethren, and the peace relationship with Israel, which would
warrant a staunch support of their legitimate demands for the
implementation of U.N. Resolutions 242 and 338 and to help evolve a
framework of a viable peace, security and cooperation among all
countries of the Middle East parties to this conflict.
Egypt feels strongly reassured that by the sponsorship of the U.S.A. and
the U.S.S.R., indeed their co-chairmanship and participation in the
Conference itself, the peace process stands on a most secure, most solid
launching pad. The participation of the E.E.C. constitutes an added and
necessary reassurance. The positive attitudes of the E.E.C. towards the
legitimate rights of the parties to the conflict invite our
appreciation. The U.N. presence symbolizes international legitimacy and
its Resolutions 242 and 338, the basis of the negotiation pro cess. The
principles of its Charter form the frame work under which any just and
acceptable settlement could be reached.
The broadbased international participation underlines the unflinching
international support for the peace process which provides the driving
force behind the progress towards the attainment of its objectives.
Peace dividends will not be exclusive reward for one party nor for the
parties directly involved in the process of negotiations. The whole
region, the Mediterranean, Europe, the world at large will share the
fruits of peace in the Middle East. They all have a high and direct
stake in the just and comprehensive settlement of the Arab-Israeli
conflict that should fulfill the legitimate inalienable rights for all
peoples, including the Palestinian people, and in particular its right
to self-determination; a peace that should provide for the security of
all states including the State of Israel through mutual recognition of
rights based on equity and justice.
Egypt at one of its finest moments, 1973, called for peace. In 1977 it
pioneered the march toward peace, in 1979 [it] endorsed this peace with
Israel. Throughout our tireless and undaunting efforts for peace, our
position has always been and will always be grounded in our commitment
to international legitimacy, to the U.N. Charter and its resolutions.
Today we are all the more devoted to the same principles unchanged and
unnegotiable.
Ladies and Gentlemen, Peace which we intend to establish, to consolidate
and safeguard, should be built in the formula "land for peace" as
reflected in Security Council Resolution 242 which unequivocally
reaffirmed the inherent principle of the U.N. Charter on the in
admissibility of acquisition of territories by force, and the rights of
all states to live in peace and security.
This peace is based on a number of fundamentals, basics and factors. It
means right for right, obligation for obligation. Security for security,
sovereignty for sovereignty. In our conviction, this and only this can
fulfill the formula peace for peace.
It is inconceivable that principles long endorsed and internationally
accepted would be renegotiated or reinterpreted, or outbid complete
withdrawal from all Arab territories, occupied in 1967, in the West Bank
including East Jerusalem, Gaza, the Syrian Golan Heights pursuant to
Security Council Resolution 242 and also from Southern Lebanon pursuant
to Security Council Resolution 425, is the right prelude to promote a
genuine peace with justice and dignity. Arab rights to Arab territories
cannot be compromised. Recognition of the legitimate rights of the
Palestinian people is the prime assurance for peaceful coexistence of
Israelis, Palestinians, indeed the Arabs in their respective homelands.
Arabs did not come to relinquish their rights, accepted, endorsed, and
supported by rules of inter national law, principles of justice, U.N.
Charter, resolutions and world consensus, nor did they come to concede
their commitments to these principles and norms; they came to search, in
good faith, with mutual trust, for a common ground for acceptable
formulas on how to meet concerns, reconcile different demands, reach
agreements and modalities that would secure the legitimate requirements
of all par ties equitably and without prejudice to the rights of any
party. We call upon Israel to do the same.
Ladies and Gentlemen,
Launching this historic peace process should not be fettered with
obstacles impeding its steady evolution towards a comprehensive
permanent settlement. Basic fundamental requirements have to be
respected and met.
First: The legal status of the Palestinian people should not be
challenged. They are not just proprietors, inhabitants or residents of
conquered territories. They are people with history, culture, distinct
national identity worthy of all the attributes of other peoples.
Second: The West Bank, Gaza and Golan Heights are occupied Arab
territories subject to the full implementation of Security Council
Resolution 242. They are not also conquered territories. They are not
lands promised to other peoples. They have their legitimate sovereigns.
Claims not based on principles of legitimacy and international law, have
no place in the world of today.
Third: Settlements established in territories occupied since 1967
including Jerusalem are illegal, and more settlements will foreclose
potential progress towards real peace, cast doubts on the credibility of
the process itself. They have to be stopped as they obstruct peace,
undermine the groundwork for negotiations on the final status of the
occupied territories and erode the will to coexist.
Fourth: The holy city of Jerusalem has its special status. It should
remain free, accessible and sacred to all followers of Islam,
Christianity and Judaism. The occupying power should not exercise
monopoly, illegal sovereignty over this holy city. Persistence of
unilateral decisions declared by the occupying power to annex the holy
city lacks any validity or legitimacy. The status of the holy city
should be subject to negotiations and settled by agreement on the
context of legitimacy established by internationally accepted
resolutions.
The Arab-Israeli dispute is in essence an Israeli-Palestinian conflict.
Any breakthrough or progress depends on the settlement of the question
of Pales tine, in terms of rights and territories. It also re quires
termination of the Israeli occupation of the Syrian territories occupied
in 1967 and Israeli withdrawal to Syrian international borders. Progress
towards attainment of these objectives should be guided by rationality
and wisdom. It should achieve justice and equity within the context of
balanced rights and obligations on the basis of international
legitimacy, conscious and with clear understanding of the historical
developments.
Ladies and Gentlemen,
This peace conference heralds a new turning point in the history of the
Middle East. It brings time-old adversaries and enemies to a meeting
ground. It attempts to bridge unsurmountable gaps among former
antagonists. It is an embodiment of the deep yearning of the Arab
people, the Palestinians and the Israelis for peace. We hope that the
Conference will resolve, with the peace process it launches, the
historic conflict between the Arabs and the Israelis.
We should not fail our peoples and the peoples of the world. We should
not succumb to moments of despair. We come here not to lose, but to win,
together. Our dividend is peace, it is a most precious dividend, that
cannot be bargained away. Mil lions of parents, Arabs and Israelis, with
their hearts broken with anguish for their lost sons, absent husbands,
for their beloved ones who never returned home, are looking forward with
anxious, long-waiting weary eyes.
These millions are gathered together by rays of hope. They are the corps
of peace not the divisions of war, they hold and raise olive branches
and address to all of us an appeal of peace and brother hood to force
open the gateway of a new history for mankind. The difficulties are
great, but prospects are bright. New vistas of cooperation will be
opened, new lines of communication will be established. The time has
come to free the Middle East from sources of tension, weapons of mass
destruction, primarily nuclear, so that resources, hitherto squandered
on arms race, will be directed for development needs, common welfare and
prosperity. This is a moment of truth, commitment and hope. We have
opted for peace. The path is thorny, the march is tiring and the
challenge is colossal. But the objective is great, noble, and worth our
pilgrimage for peace.
Thank you.