(Commentary by Amos Harel, "Ha'aretz", 25.10.98, p. A.6)
The signing of the agreement in Washington is supposed to reduce the
likelihood of terrorist attacks. Assuming that a large-scale attack will
hold up the implementation of the agreement, Hamas will not wish to be
seen by the Palestinian public as the factor which prevented the handover
of 13.1% of the national territory into Palestinian hands. It will also
be especially important to the Palestinian Authority to demonstrate to
the Americans their determination in the war on terror.
However, the security forces reject assumptions. "In the coming days," a
senior military source told Ha'aretz, "the danger of terrorist attacks
will heighten. Hamas has an interest in carrying out a large-scale act of
terror as soon as possible. Their objective will be to foil the
agreement, in the stage between signing and implementation."
The IDF thinks that in the eyes of Hamas, the agreement is a Palestinian
surrender and a "trick", mainly because it includes the freeing of only a
minority of the Palestinian prisoners -- the most important issue from
the point of view of the public in the territories. The head of Hamas'
political department, Khaled Masha'al, expressed the leadership's view at
the weekend: Hamas, he said, would avoid a Palestinian civil war, out of
a sense of responsibility, but "our rifles will remain trained on the
Israeli enemy."
The expected Palestinian Authority's strengthened efforts against
terrorism is likely to actually encourage the Hamas to carry out an
attack quickly, before the PA changes its deployments and toughens its
stance toward the Islamic organizations, and before the agreement is
passed by the Israeli government and Knesset. Their main difficulty is
operational: a number of senior operatives in the military wing -- Muhi
a-Din a-Sharif, the Adel brothers and Amad Awdallah -- have been killed
this year. Others, like Jamal al-Natshe, have been arrested by the PA.
The wave of arrests organized by the IDF and the GSS has also hit at the
operational infrastructure of Hamas. The analysis is that the Hamas is
finding it increasingly difficult to carry out large-scale terrorist
attacks. If indeed the organization is not able to carry out attacks
within the Green Line -- and the security establishment is aware of a
number of plans to carry out actions of this kind, which have been foiled
recently, then the attempts to hit at soldiers and settlers in the
territories may be expected to continue. One positive effect of the
agreement is likely to be on the activities of the "Tanzim", the Fatah
popular movement. In the last two months, the IDF considers, the Tanzim
were involved in a number of shooting incidents, mainly in the Hebron
area. These actions, in which there were no casualties, showed the
frustration in the lower ranks of Fatah at the situation in the peace
process. It may now be expected that Arafat will take a harder line and
the PA will not permit attacks of this kind.
The security forces are also concerned by the response of the Israeli
right to the agreement, especially the settlers. Against this background,
monitoring of the extreme right has been increased in the last period.
Security sources consider that while the possibility of "acts of despair"
by Jewish terrorists cannot be ruled out, the likelihood of this is not
high. The assumption is that the majority of the settlers will suffice
with non- violent protests, such as demonstrations and the blocking of
roads. Attempts to establish illegal settlements is likely to sharply
increase, mainly in areas which are not being handed over to the PA, in
an effort to create facts in the prelude to the permanent agreement.
There is likely to be an increase in threats on the lives of the
ministers involved in signing the agreement. Two months ago, the papers
were full of reports on the increased security around the prime minister
and key ministers, out of fear of an attack on them by right wing
elements. In retrospect, these publications have been shown to have been
based on exaggerations by the various ministries. This time, if the
political atmosphere heats up, security really will in all likelihood be
beefed up.