"We are on the frontline in the war against poverty!" declared Professor
Ra'anan Weitz with passion, as we sat in his breezy Jerusalem apartment. He
should know. The forceful 84-year-old expert on rural development was one
of the handful of pioneers who nursed the tiny new State of Israel through
its initial 25-year-period of astonishing growth. Although the growth has
slowed down a bit since then, Weitz hardly has.
As a student of agriculture in the 1930s, and later as a field instructor,
says Weitz, "I understood that the study of agriculture cannot be just
technical, but has to be part of development."
Regional development. That became the key phrase. Already in the 1930s,
the Jewish Agency - the "shadow government" of the still unborn State of
Israel and today still deals with immigrant absorption - embraced the
premise that an independent state could only succeed if it already had a
solid agricultural base. Land was purchased and farming villages
established. After Independence in 1948, the Agency continued to be
responsible for rural development throughout Israel. Ra'anan Weitz became
Deputy Director, and ultimately Director, of its Settlement Department. I
asked Prof. Weitz what challenges he faced in those first years.
"I was given responsibility for the grand plan of Israel's rural
development. The concept I introduced was that rural development cannot
depend on agriculture alone, but has to be integrated with appropriate
industry and - especially - support services." He mused for a moment, then
added: "And so, as part of my position and my profession, I made it a
personal goal to get involved in aid and assistance to developing
countries, especially from the aspect of rural development." MASHAV! I
immediately thought: outreach to developing countries. But Prof. Weitz had
not finished elaborating on the basic concept.
Already at the beginning of the century, noted Weitz, Jewish pioneers had
rejected the subsistence farming that was typical of the peasant societies
of the Middle East and parts of Eastern Europe (from which many of them had
come). Their experiments with new social forms produced the "kibbutz"
(collective farming village) and later the "moshav" (cooperative village of
family farms). These new villages practised diversified farming, with the
resultant integrated economy that became the basis for further development,
both up to and after Independence.
Weitz explained: "Every agricultural unit deals with all branches of
cultivation and livestock - grain, vegetables, fruit, fodder, dairy
animals, poultry. This is very different from the traditional farming of
just raising enough to feed your family. But even diversification is only
an intermediate stage, necessary but intermediate on the way to specialized
agriculture."
The problem, he continued, is that "the moment agriculture develops, it
employs fewer and fewer people, and the villages cannot exist on farming
alone. They have to move into additional areas like industry, services,
tourism. That demands a radical change in the physical infrastructure and
in development policy as a whole. It took Europe 100 years to make the
transition.
"This highlights one of the pitfalls of the technical aid the rich and
developed world gives to the poor and developing world. Many developing
nations are only now emerging from traditional farming to modern
market-oriented agriculture, and they have to realize that they cannot leap
immediately to expensive technology that does not provide employment. They
have to go through the stage we went through over 25 years, though they can
do it more quickly. They have to learn diversified farming first, though in
the knowledge that they will eventually move to specialized agriculture.
"Israel is in a unique position to reach out to developing nations,
because it has itself been through the experience of nation-building
relatively recently. We need to teach them not what we're doing today, but
what we did in the 1950s, when we had to deal with land development and
settling people on the land who knew nothing about farming. We did the
right thing then. The fact is that for over two decades we had an
economic growth of 9% a year - even higher than that of Japan!"
When we talk about technical and professional cooperation with
developing countries, Israel has the edge, Weitz asserts: "We 'deliver
the goods' in a more concrete and practical manner. Our people are
first- or second-generation 'doers' - they've 'been there' themselves.
Countries like Germany, Britain, Canada and the U.S.A. have 'been there'
too, but generations ago. Therefore there is a special appreciation for
our work."
I went back to history. The very 'raison d'etre' of MASHAV, founded by
Israel's Ministry of Foreign Affairs, is organizing courses in Israel for
participants from developing countries, despatching Israeli experts to help
in the field in those countries themselves, implementing projects and
cooperating on research programs. Ra'anan Weitz has long been involved in
exactly that kind of work, usually in partnership with MASHAV.
How did it all begin? Weitz: "In 1955, U Nu, the prime minister of Burma
and a personal friend of Ben-Gurion [Israel's first prime minister],
visited Israel. Ben-Gurion asked me to show him the country, especially the
new rural areas. U Nu got excited by what we were doing. He said 'This is
what Burma needs to do'."
There were two enormously ambitious national projects then in full swing
in Israel. The National Water Carrier was designed to integrate all the
country's water resources, and pipe water from the verdant north to the
arid south. What impressed U Nu, however, was the Lachish Project, which,
in a few short years, developed a semi-arid region in the south of Israel,
and settled in it tens of thousands of refugee new immigrants. New farming
villages were clustered around a rural centre, while each cluster was, so
to speak, a "satellite" of an urban hub designed to provide regional
services and infrastructure. Lachish became Israel's show piece: "It was
the model that served all the contingents that visited," said Prof. Weitz.
"U Nu accepted my suggestion to set up between five and ten new villages in
one region of Burma - a large project by their standards - and send the
core of the settler group to Israel for a year to train in some of our
veteran moshav-type villages, and return home as instructors. They did
that, and we sent expert Israeli instructors back to Burma with them as
well - an agronomist, a water engineer, an irrigation expert, a
sociologist, and so on. That [interdisciplinary aspect] is part of the
'integrative approach' as well.
"It was all coordinated through the Israeli Foreign Ministry. All of a
sudden our diplomats were dealing with issues of development that had
nothing to do with diplomacy! That's how the whole thing began." [In 1958
MASHAV was founded as an arm of the Foreign Ministry to coordinate similar
courses and projects.]
I asked Prof. Weitz whether conditions in other countries parallel those in
Israel enough to copy the Israeli experience? "Not just parallel," he
replied, "but amazingly similar! Most developing countries today are as we
were in the 1950s. I was the first Israeli to be officially invited to the
People's Republic of China. It was in 1986, for an International Symposium
on the Strategy of Rural Development. I was really amazed at how similar
their basic problems were to those of Israel in 1949. The argument back
then was over the direction of Israeli agriculture. One view was that we
needed to concentrate on growing what we needed for our own subsistence,
i.e. grain. But we don't have enough land per family to grow the grain we
need. I took an opposing view, which was eventually accepted, that we
should exploit our local conditions to produce the most economically viable
crops, and we'd sell some of that to buy grain.
"I discovered, to my surprise, that the fields of China are not like those
of a developing country. They're beautiful, with very high yields. There is
enough food for everyone in China, but the country is poor, because they
grow mainly grain. With economic growth, there will be changes, of course.
The Chinese adopted some of our ideas, but they couldn't use them all. Our
approach is one of 'regional integration,' that is, there has to be
coordination among national bodies at the regional level in order to run
agriculture, industry and services together. In a country like China,
government is concentrated in the capital, and every sector, every
ministry, is organized 'vertically.' Regional coordination becomes
virtually impossible, because all coordination is done in the capital, and
any plan has to travel up the 'ladder,' and it can take 2-3 years until it
gets approved."
The regional 'integrative' philosophy Prof. Weitz describes was developed
by the Settlement Study Centre - since renamed the Development Study Centre
- which Weitz himself founded in his native city of Rehovot, southeast of
Tel Aviv, and has become known as the Rehovot Approach. The Centre was an
outgrowth of the National and University Institute of Agriculture, which in
turn is an umbrella for Hebrew University's Faculty of Agriculture in
Rehovot and the various government agricultural experimental stations. "The
task of the Centre," says Weitz, "is to study the relationship between the
person or human organizations and the technological changes in agriculture,
in the light of economic growth." The integrative philosophy has become
known as the Rehovot Approach.
The Approach has won other adherents abroad. The development of a region in
Venezuela assisted by Israeli experts has surged ahead of neighbouring
regions. In northeastern Brazil, the University of Ceara opened a new
department (with Professor Weitz as a guest lecturer) to teach the Rehovot
Approach. Over 25 years, says Weitz, the agriculture of the Ceara region
has changed decisively, and the regional centre of Forteleza has grown from
little more than a village to a city worthy of the name.
I asked about the relationship of the Centre and MASHAV, and for that
matter the Jewish Agency's Settlement Department, all of which have been
involved in working with developing nations.
"At the beginning the Settlement Department was very active, because no one
else was doing it. When MASHAV was founded I took the Department out of
this activity, and [later] got the Centre involved instead. But I didn't
want the Centre to have to deal with issues that would distract it from its
professional tasks, and that is where MASHAV comes in. It helps find the
international funding for the Centre to run its courses, in Spanish for
Latin American countries, and in English for participants from Asia and
Africa."
Perhaps the most far-reaching of the courses run by the MASHAV/DSC
partnership is the one on Integrated Rural Regional Planning. It runs in
Israel for six months, and then the whole group of course participants
together with its Israeli instructors, moves to a developing country for
another two months. (In recent years the course is given in Israel for five
months and in the recipient country for one more month.) "Together with the
host country," says Weitz, "we select a region that needs planning, and the
participants, professionals in various areas of development in their own
countries, are taught planning according to the local conditions of a
developing country."
"The idea is to work with people in the provinces to plan their own
development programs. Fifteen years ago, I thought of computerizing our
system, to integrate all the factors and find the best solutions. We got
IBM interested, and I told them from the beginning: 'We work within the
regions, and this aid has to be for the regions. The program needs to be
designed for the PC.' But IBM designed a program for the mainframe, and
never transferred it to the PC. So we designed our own program,
sophisticated but simple, once the second-generation, more powerful PCs
became available. We established a computerized laboratory, and we teach
every participants to work with this program. The aim is for every region
to find the most economically viable alternative for each sector such as
agriculture, industry, tourism, technical services and social services,
according to local conditions. This is what Israel needed in the 1950s and
didn't have!"
"We've always had a close personal relationship with MASHAV, from the
director down to the most junior planner," concluded Ra'anan Weitz. "Unlike
MASHAV's own institutions, the Centre is independent, and yet it's more
closely connected to MASHAV than its own institutions! Together we are at
the frontline in the war against poverty. There is no doubt about it!"